Contents of Plan

Part I

A. Introduction to the Planning Thought Process

B. High School Diversity Programs Need to Be All-inclusive: This Means Addressing Lesbian,

Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Issues

C. Planning for Diversity within a Public High School

Part II

D. Understanding the Details of the Plan's Foundation

    1. Key Players Involved in the Change Process
    2. Timeline and Resource Requirements
    3. Desired Outcomes and Potential Benefits
    4. Justifications of Anticipated Resource and Budget Expenditures
    5. Strategies which Lead to the Plan's Enhancement

Part III

E. Evaluating the Progress of Change

    1. Methods and Players in the Evaluation Process
    2. Predicting the Good, while also Foreseeing the Realistic Woes

 

A. Introduction to the Planning Thought Process

    The following plan for change considers the environment of a public high school. There were three major thoughts that went into composing this plan. The first is the understanding that as a public high school, it receives the majority of its funding from its surrounding community. Realizing this fact, the following plan concentrates a lot of effort at getting community participation, involvement, and support. This can be seen during phase one of the plan. If community support is not attained, implementation and/or success of this plan will not be achieved.

    The second consideration for this plan was the need to emphasize the necessity for the diversity plan to be all-inclusive. A high school may have a current plan in place for managing its diversity, however, they may be flawed if they do not seek an all-inclusive definition of diversity. A diversity program that does not give equal respect to all human beings is doomed to fail before it is even implemented. Specifically, if the diversity plan begins to exclude certain individuals, it loses its credibility and risks a reputation of being more of an agenda that is established by a select group or groups of diversity. When this happens, a plague begins to emerge within the high school and presents various aspects of malice.

    In association with the second consideration, the third consideration looks at the school's population of lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. As this diversity group tends to be more of a hidden minority, LGBT people tend to be frequently overlooked in a number of diversity programs, especially when they pertain to a school environment. This plan will give special emphasis to LGBT people and the issues they face within a high school environment.

B. High School Diversity Programs Need to Be All-inclusive: This

Means Addressing Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender Issues

    Childhood learning during the primary and secondary education years often has the potential to influence an individual for the rest of their life. In order to achieve a work environment that is sensitive to the importance of diversity, we must begin by teaching some fundamental principles to society at a young age. We must teach our children to respect one another, regardless of a person's race or color of their skin, gender, age, ethnic background, physical abilities/qualities, religion, and even sexual orientation. However, what we find is that it is often difficult for many people in United States to find tolerance, understanding, and acceptance for all of these dimensions of diversity. Acceptance for fellow human beings who are of a different sexual orientation is sometimes the most difficult for people intolerant of differences. Perhaps because sexual orientation is not as visibly apparent as the other primary dimensions of diversity, gays and lesbians commonly blend in with their heterosexual counterparts, thus easily assimilating into the heterosexual majority. Also, heterosexual-minded people often have a tendency to group gay and lesbian people with the heterosexual majority and respect them as fellow heterosexuals until they discover otherwise. These two factors lead to gay and lesbian people as being seen as an invisible minority. Although every high school should desire an all inclusive diversity program, the dimension of sexual orientation poses certain challenges when looking to educate other people towards acceptance.

    Particularly challenging is that the U.S. society's views regarding sexual orientation are often heavily influenced by the secondary dimension of religion. A number of people do not accept gay and lesbian people because of the moral guidelines that are established and emphasized by their religion. Although religions often have a large number of moral guidelines to follow, not every guideline is given equal emphasis. While some moral guidelines are viewed as absolute, others carry less of a stigma when violated. A good example of this within U.S. society would be to look at the Bible's view of greed as considered to be a deadly sin. In the U.S. capitalist society, greed is often considered to be a respectable personal trait. Hence, you would rarely see a group of religious activists picketing outside a corporate headquarters building to protest the greed that many executives are perceived to have in their positions. This can be attributed much to the fact that the majority of the people living in the U.S. capitalistic society also maintain a certain degree of greed in their lives as well. Homosexuality is often misunderstood by many people and often leads to confusion since it is viewed so differently.

    This leads to another challenge for bringing acceptance to our children, which is the idea that people associate sex education and sexual orientation as being one in the same subject, often not desiring to discuss the latter at all. Continuing with this barrier of having LGBT issues included in the school's diversity plan is the thought that if the school is going to integrate sexual orientation into the curriculum, the entire curriculum will be teaching our children about sex. It is as if people hear the first word 'sexual' and their opinion is already formulated. When looking at sexual orientation from a sexual education point of view, the policies and opinions of how to educate our youth about sex varies greatly from school district to school district. This creates an enormous barrier. It is essential for people to focus more on the word 'orientation' rather than 'sexual' when thinking about the dimensional aspects of diversity. After all, schools include sexual orientation in their curriculums every day. Schools just choose not to be diverse when teaching about this subject. There are many daily examples where schools include heterosexual sexual orientation within the curriculum, while ignoring orientations of other groups represented in the classroom. An English class has children reading story after story, which contain themes of heterosexual relationships. In a teacher's examples of social norms and discussions with students about what they desire to be in their lives after they are married and have children. In our history lessons that discuss the presidential first ladies, but never discuss the same sex partners of famous LGBT historians.

    This plan for change will establish an outline for use by any high school to create a plan for educating the students, teachers, faculty, and the administration of the school about the importance of recognizing the significance of accepting others without regard to their sexual orientation. This plan for change acknowledges that the topic of sexual orientation deserves to be included when teaching sex education, but more importantly, the plan will include sexual orientation in all aspects of managing diversity and respecting others within the school. This includes awareness education, conveying the skills necessary for individual behavioral changes, as well as a complete integration of issues of sexual orientation when setting forth all inclusive diversity initiatives. By failing to address sexual orientation in these manners, the school will continue to encounter a number of problems that occur when not managing diversity properly.

    The results of a poorly managed diversity plan will be felt within the school academically, socially, and economically for students, faculty, parents, and the overall community. Student performance is affected when students do not see themselves as meaningful or valuable contributors to society. If these students become overwhelmed with the feelings of failure to society, they may drop out and/or even look for an end to their distressed life. According to The Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Study performed by the Centers for Disease Control and the Massachusetts Department of Education, gay, lesbian, and bi-sexual students were five times more likely to attempt suicide in 1996 than heterosexual students. Students who choose instead to fight such injustice may struggle to gain acceptance and support of their teachers, peers, and family. Statistics from the same study as above have shown gay, lesbian, or bi-sexual students were more than four times more likely than their heterosexual counterparts of being threatened or injured with a weapon at school in 1996. The study also shows them more than four times more likely of having been in a physical fight resulting in treatment by a doctor or nurse during the 1996 school year.

    If a student turns to the administration for assistance against harassment but does not find any support, the school district and the administration can be taken to court and charges can be made against them for failure to create a safe and adequate learning environment for every student. Such a court battle can strain the finances of the district and take the faculty away from their duties of administrating and educating their students. Not to mention the stress that is put on the faculty and teachers. In the meantime, the student may find himself or herself going from school to school in an attempt to be accepted for who they are. Parents of gay and lesbian children will also have encounter great stress and financial strain as they try to support their child during this turmoil. Parents may even choose to pay for transporting the child to a distant private school. There are many impacts on the community as well.

    When looking at the impact on the community, one can look at the community as a society, or the community as an economy. As a society, the community grows more intolerant of other people who are different from the majority. Gays and lesbians are not comfortable being themselves and are forced to lead double lives. This causes high levels of stress amongst gays and lesbians in the community. This stress is not good for the health of the overall population. Stress also begins to manifest itself into the heterosexual population by experiencing incidents of hate and violence over time, based on the lack of understanding of how to adequately deal with such differences. Violence can even be taken against other heterosexuals in the community if they are interpreted as appearing to be homosexual or for even being associated with known or suspected homosexuals. Just this past April, Decatur's Milikin University had to send the following email message campus wide.

    Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 3:13 AM

    Subject: Assault against student

    At approximately 2200, on 04-04-00, a female student was assaulted by an

    unknown assailant north of Pilling Chapel. During the incident, the

    assailant made the statement, "I seen you hanging with them fags". Please

    take precaution when walking alone, especially at night. Try to walk with

    other students and utilize the escort van service whenever possible. Keep

    Safety and Security informed of any suspicious persons or activity that you

    witness. Thank you.

    Officer Powel

    Millikin Safety and Security

    Another incident that also occurred during the spring semester at Illinois State University was of a young male college student who was walking across campus to meet up with his girlfriend to go out dancing. A couple of homophobic males came across him and beat him up, causing him to be hospitalized. During their attack, they made anti-gay remarks and made fun of the way he dressed. He was wearing a flashy shirt that evidently appeared to the attackers to signify this young man's sexual orientation. Unfortunately, I was unable to locate the article again for this plan and am only including what I remember reading. It is important to keep in mind that homophobia affects everyone. This is not to downplay the significance of the need to protect and include LGBT, however, it is sometimes important to underscore this argument against all forms of homophobia in an attempt to gain support from a larger number of people.

    Homophobia also reinforces strict gender roles, which society places on individuals. This in turn inhibits the full potential of most individuals and can limit others in their desired career pursuit. Another destructive element of homophobia is its ability to build barriers between same sex friendships and relationships. The fear of being labeled is always present for those who are insecure about their own sexuality. For example, even if two heterosexual males in the U.S. are close friends and they both know they are heterosexual, their fear of what others in society or even what the other friend would think if they were to do certain things together, thus putting limits on their friendship. They would perhaps be less likely to hug one another, hold hands, dance together, or have any other physical contact that again relates back to a non-traditional male gender role.

    There are two more impairments of homophobia that are related more closely to this plan and reasons for enhancements in a high school's diversity initiatives. First, homophobia and the harassment that comes with it, causes increases in a teenager's sexual activity. This increase can lead to many risks. Siting The Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Study of 1997, one such risk shows gay, lesbian, and bi-sexual youth (36.9%) were twice as likely than heterosexuals (14.5%) in 1996 to have either become pregnant or have gotten someone pregnant. Teenagers who are being harassed by their peers for being gay or lesbian may feel a need to prove otherwise. Along with this risk of sexual activity, all youth are at greater risk of catching sexually transmitted diseases if attending a school that chooses not to address all important issues in a sex education curriculum.

    The second and most important reason homophobia hurts everyone is because it hinders any school's attempts at implementing a plan for diversity management. There is the utmost importance for any effective diversity plan to be all-inclusive and not allow discrimination against anyone for any reason. If discrimination and hate are allowed to exist within a school's walls and down the school's hallways, it will eventually permeate into other dimensions. Students who see discrimination occurring in one dimension of diversity, will create an atmosphere of hate that will lead to others discriminating along other dimensions. This compounding negative affect can ruin any well-intentioned plan for diversity. That is why the foundation of this plan will be all-inclusive and give respect to all individuals regardless of their varying dimensions of diversity. The reason why this plan chooses to concentrate much attention to the LGBT issues is due to the high levels of ignorance and avoidance that currently exist regarding this dimension.

    From an economic perspective, the community loses out on the maximum number of highly educated individuals they can produce. If large numbers of gay and lesbian students are not supported in their education or allowed the opportunity to excel, they will drop out or become too preoccupied with day to day struggles to be academically successful. This becomes a tremendous waste of human potential, which could have contributed abounding achievements to the community. Perhaps an individual does make it through the educational system successfully, the individual may be more likely to look for other more supportive communities to work and live. This again restricts the maximum number of highly skilled and educated people within the community and retards the potential of those who do stay as they may be forced to assimilate.

    When devising the plan for change, the school should not only be looked at as a place to educate future workers of the United States, but also as a work environment for many teachers, faculty, and administration. These workers will also benefit greatly from a well-managed and all-inclusive diversity plan that requires respect towards everyone. With such a plan, stresses can be reduced. Reducing these stresses will lead to lower costs of absenteeism and greater energy, quality, and creativity in the work performed. Workers may focus their attention on the job itself rather than spending time and energy hiding their true identities from their coworkers, parents, and students. There is also enormous pressure put on gay and lesbian school workers by the overall community. People who do not accept homosexuals often judge LGBT people who work in a school environment as being deviant and corruptive to children and frequently label them as sex offenders. This makes for a non-supportive work environment, even if the fellow administrators and faculty support the LGBT school worker. With this view of LGBT school workers in mind, the school worker also has to live with the thought of potentially having a vindictive student make a slanderous remark if the student becomes angry with them for any reason. For example, a student may deservedly receive a failing grade for the course, or become upset with a disciplinary action taken upon them for their behavior. The possibility exists for the student to take advantage of the community's disapproval of the school worker's sexual orientation and make an erroneous accusation that the school worker made a sexual advance toward the student. Although the advance may have never occurred, the student is getting what they see as being revenge. Meanwhile, the teacher's reputation in that school and community is tarnished, and a long, costly, and publicly humiliating trial follows. These and other barriers keep many highly skilled, intelligent, and talented LGBT people apathetic about entering the education employment sector.

    One teacher from an Illinois school district told of a similar incident. He has gained many friendships with his students over the years of teaching. He used to coach his school's debate team and currently he takes small groups of students to Europe each year. He also spends a lot of time remodeling his large, old house and has a few rooms, which are made into apartments where local college students rent out. Sometimes, he will have some students help him out with his remodeling in order to provide them an opportunity to earn extra money for spending on their trip to Europe. This teacher is a well-respected individual by a majority of the faculty and a significant number of community members. His students all think he is the greatest as well. However, one year he was drawn into a slanderous ordeal involving a false made by a boy at the high school he teaches.

    The boy had been spreading rumors around the school that the teacher had fondled him. Eventually, the student came to the teacher with the story and told him that he would not say anything more if he could have some money. The teacher told the boy that he was basically crazy and that he can get into a lot of trouble for spreading such lies. The boy was not as mature as he should have been for his age, and has a more difficult time deciphering reality. The boy ended up going to the school principal after being refused money. Unfortunately, the principal at the time was homophobic and played right into the boy's plan. The principal and the teacher had never really seen eye to eye on many things and the principal saw this as an opportunity to rid himself of this gay teacher from his school.

    Over a lot of time and a lot of publicity and demoralizing attacks against the teacher, the case finally went to trial. Even though the teacher had the principal against him, he had the backing and support of a vast number of parents and students from the high school. In the end, it was this support that brought him to victory over the slanderous statement, but could never repair all of the pain and humiliation that he had gone through. The students in the school told about how the boy was always lying and how common it was for him to make up stories and lies to tell other students in order to gain attention. It also came out during the trial that the boy at the time of the initial accusation had wrecked a friend's car and was looking to get money somehow to repair the damage.

    Eventually, the boy came to admit that he had made up the whole story and had apologized to the teacher; but this was not until after the overwhelming negative publicity and pain the teacher had gone through with the trial that eventually proved the teacher to be innocent. The teacher told me that if it had not been for the support of his students and their parents and other influential community members, he would not have made it through the ordeal. He could not see how a newly hired teacher under the same circumstances would have survived in the same way. This real example goes to show the tragedy of such a possibility.

 C. Planning for Diversity within a Public High School

    In order to solve the stated problem, this plan will continue to stress the need for an all-inclusive diversity program that defines diversity in the broadest sense. By maintaining a broad definition, the high school will work to equally stamp out hate, bias, prejudice, and discrimination. If a student or a group of students are allowed to use any one dimension of diversity as reason to put another student down, this opens the door for hate within the school. This hate presents itself like a virus that plants itself inside the body, in this case the high school. Once this virus has been allowed inside the body, it begins to spread, until it works its way through the entire body. Some viral symptoms are not noticeable, while others are. However, some viral symptoms that are noticeable are not traceable. Eventually, the body becomes very ill, and may even die. If the high school allows this virus to enter through its front doors, it will eventually cause severe illness throughout the entire school. Signs of this illness may already be obvious, while others are subtler. Nonetheless, it exists and continues to bring harm onto the entire school. There are four ways to rid the school of this virus called hate: Knowledge and information sharing regarding various aspects of diversity; Diversity awareness training; Diversity skills-based training; Integration of diversity initiatives.

    First, people have to be provided with the information and knowledge relating to the various dimensions of diversity. This information will provide people with a basic understanding of the various types of diversity. Next, this knowledge must be followed up with awareness training. People should be made aware of the differences of the various groups of diversity, however, an even greater focus must be put on showing the similarities. A communication will be started between two people if the people are allowed to see how other people who on the outside may appear to be very different are actually very alike. This communication will lead to eliminating any stereotypes and myths each person has about the other. The third approach involves providing people with the skills it takes to live and participate in daily life with other people who are from a different diversity group. When looking at an all-inclusive diversity plan that maintains respect for all human beings, this plan will focus primarily on helping people learn how to change their behavior. Though it would be nice to have the ability to change everyone's attitude, this plan recognizes the improbability of such an achievement. The favored alternative is to see everyone as human and deserving of the same basic respect that they also desire. Although it is located throughout the entire plan, the last method to be used by this plan for establishing an all-inclusive diversity program will be integration of diversity initiatives and strategies into the framework of the high school. When diversity becomes an integral part of every function of the high school, there will no longer be a vital need to establish a separate program. Being the fourth mentioned approach should not imply that this should wait until the very end of the plan to implement these strategies and initiatives. This fourth approach will be started at the beginning of the plan's implementation.

 D. Understanding the Details of the Plan's Foundation

 

1. Key Players Involved in the Change Process

2. Timeline and Resource Requirements

    ** Not all budget fee items are able to be determined as some totals and numbers that relate to budgeting calculation are unknown

3. Desired Outcomes and Potential Benefits

4. Justification of Anticipated Resource and Budget Expenditures

    ** Not all budget fee items are able to be determined as some totals and numbers that relate to budgeting calculation are unknown

       

5. Strategies which Lead to the Plan's Enhancement

E. Evaluating the Progress of Change

1. Methods and Players in the Evaluation Process

    The importance of evaluation cannot be emphasized enough. Evaluation in this plan will be a continuous process. Both formal and informal types of evaluating will occur. All players within the plan will do an informal evaluation. On an individual level, this informal evaluation will be done by means of self-reflection. Plan supporters will be asked after each meeting to reflect on their feelings during the next week to assess their further development needs for achieving their personal goals in diversity. Individual supporters will also be asked to provide continuous feedback regarding the plan's process. Supporters may comment on anything from the amount of media coverage to the outspoken agenda of a distinct diversity group within the support group. A key panel of supporters from the community diversity committee will review this feedback to determine any necessary corrections in the direction of the plan. This panel will be nominated and voted on by all of the supporters of the plan during month three of phase one, and then new elections will be held during month thirteen of phase one after more supporters have been attainted. During phase one, since this is a volunteer effort, there will not be a strict formal evaluation for supporters. Instead, the key panel members will evaluate the needs of the plan and provide direction for its supporters.

    Success of phase one can be determined by the increase in the number of plan supporters. Continuous review of the local media can and should be maintained in order to measure the amount of positive and negative feedback regarding the plan. It is important to note that not everyone who is perceived as having a negative comment is a non-supporter of the plan. Often people will submit questions or have questions that sound more like attacks, but these people may sometimes just be ignorant of how to express their questions in a positive other way. This is important for the reason of having the opportunity to educate this person. Many times, supporters of diversity would block off the underlying question and merely focus attack on the way the question was worded. If the question is not addressed and properly answered, the person who asked it will remain ignorant. Like the supporter, the person asking the question can become blocked in hearing the actual answer to the question if the answer is lead by an attack. Unfortunately, both phase one and two involve behavioral changes on the part of individuals. Behavioral changes are rarely easily or accurately evaluated.

    During phase two of the plan, evaluation should fall primarily on the high school principal and the internal diversity committee. The diversity committee can report findings to the principal, as he/she is the ultimate authority within the high school. There are a number of things to be measured within phase two of the plan. One method of measurement would be to have a variety of diversity related brochures printed for the students to take. Each brochure can address a different dimension of diversity. These brochures will be made available throughout the school in a number of locations: school lunch room, counseling offices, classrooms where extra-curricular activities are held, the library, locker rooms, and other locations depending on the high school. The locations of the placement of the brochures, combined with the quantity of brochures that are taken can provide the committee with a general idea for who is obtaining what types of diversity information. These brochures will obtain educational information about the various dimensions of diversity and will have a goal of eliminating stereotypes and myths. This same information can also be made available online utilizing the school's web site. Although this may count the number of 'hits' obtained for each diversity site, it is uncertain if it is being accessed by the community's high school students or other individuals in the community or elsewhere.

    Another method for evaluating the effect of the plan would be to track the loan frequency of the various diversity books as classified on the various category lists. The loan frequency should be determined before and then again every semester after the lists have been distributed. Frequency in the usage of other library multi-media related to diversity can be recorded and tracked as well. These combined evaluation measures will determine the effectiveness of certain aspects of the plan for students and school workers, although, with students it may be a bit more difficult when considering diversity related to sexual orientation.

    Sexual orientation is a topic that still maintains a large societal stigma, especially depending upon a student's parent's religion, as was conveyed by a high school teacher. The teacher explained that a student had come to them requesting a GSA organization. Nothing further came of the request as the student later told the teacher (s)he would be unable to participate in such an organization as their parents would not allow it due to their religious beliefs. Thus, when looking at evaluating the library aspect of this plan, it would be necessary for the librarian to not only track and record the loan frequency, but to also track and record the frequency of these specific books being taken off the shelf and perhaps read within the library. Students may also try to steal certain books, which would have a stigma attached to them since they would not want to be caught even reading the book in the library.

    Pre and post year surveys may also be utilized in determining the effectiveness of the plan and to assess the needs for improvements within the plan. Surveys can be a scantron type given to the student in the classroom. In order to obtain more information regarding opinions, suggestions, and concerns, an additional portion of the survey can be given to the student to take home and complete. Students who feel compelled about certain issues will complete this additional survey form. It is even possible for the high school to send the student home with two sections of the survey, one for the student and one for the parent/guardian. The survey can be a simple envelope and sheet of paper to save money. The student or parent/guardian can provide the paper to answer the questions, although the more difficult the survey is to answer, the less likely it is for being returned.

    School administrators, teachers, and faculty should not be discouraged if there is a sudden increase in reported verbal violations and/or attacks related to issues of diversity. It is a common occurrence to have such increases due to several reasons. First of all, students may now be more aware of what is right and what is wrong and feel a need to report offenses, which they previously were unsure about such justification. Secondly, a student who had been harassed in the past may not have known what to do or where to go. Included in this thought is the fact that the student now feels confident that he/she has the support from the school administration to back up their complaint of harassment. A feeling that something is going to be done about the harassment now exists, thus inviting more complaints. Another reason for an increase may be due to backlash. Students who have been very comfortable in their majority position or with their discriminating ideas now feel threatened. Some people will have a difficult time changing their way of thinking about other people and may instead lash out at others around them. However, rather than lashing out, it would be good for a school worker to become aware the signals of such attitudes and feelings and provide the person with alternative ways of dealing with their conflict.

    Keeping a count of the past and present diversity related anonymous complaints is a valid way of determining the effectiveness of the plan. As time goes by, there should be a steady decreasing number of complaints related to diversity. If this is not the case, the committee should determine which category of diversity needs to be addressed and further education should be provided to the high school in this category.

    One more way to evaluate the effectiveness of the all-inclusive diversity plan at the high school would be to try to determine the number of students at the school who openly acknowledge they are LGBT and see if this number increases or decreases. However, this is not a very accurate, easy, or effective way to measure the plan's success. Since all people are different, not everyone will express himself or herself in the same way, even if they are LGBT or not. It is very difficult to determine if someone is LGBT unless they come up and tell you. It is also a possibility of having students claiming to be LGBT in order to receive attention from their peers and can lead to further difficulty with this evaluation method.

    Continue to monitor the diversity that exists in the school's sports and other extra-curricular activities to see if the diversity is increasing or decreasing. These activities should be inviting to all students and not limited to one set dimension of diversity. Also, continue to assess the total attendance of school events and activities. These should also display a wide array of students of different diversities. Not only should attention be paid to the number of students and the ratios of diversity represented, but also see how these different students are grouped as they sit. This can determine if they are becoming more comfortable with each other and able to integrate and make diverse friends outside of the classroom on a voluntary basis.

    Evaluation of teachers can also reflect on their desire to learn more about diversity topics. If the school administration receives requests from teachers and faculty for further diversity training, the plan will be working. Perhaps a teacher wants different training or more of the same. If the same training is requested to be repeated, the teacher may not have paid attention the first time, as they did not see the need. Now, after being faced with students who demand this teacher's awareness and behavior change, the teacher feels the need to understand the diversity training material.

2. Predicting the Good, While also Foreseeing the Realistic Woes